WHAT ALL THESE MAY IMPLY

What all these may imply I have written in http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread662516/pg1 .
I have got only weak support there but no objections.

It may not be all that bad but I have seen today that Dr. Hawking gets also more pessimistical view of the future of our next generations :
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/11/18/stephen-hawking-space-exploration_n_1101975.html?ref=canada 

Knowing about an interview with Werner Freiherr von Braun after his return to Germany I am unfortunately not as optimistical as he is about the space travel. It will be extremely hard.
Under these expected conditions next genarations will have hard times. They are supposed to be extremely economical. They need to calculate thrice before they act.

They will need to conduct research on the topics and find out some reliable results. Of course if they can find funds supporting this kind of research. Most probably they will be scarcer than ever.

I mentioned implicitly, via Aykhan questions in
http://www.test-dr.com/DERSANE/4.-sinif-matematik-test/dogal-sayilar-toplama-1.2.html
in english http://www.test-dr.com/education/4th-Grade-Mathematics/addition-natural-numbers-1.2.html
that we could more easily get to base two coding whereas we began with base 60.

We today feel ourselves much closer to inductive thinking whereas we began with deductive. These may mean intervention from the outer space on which I will write later.

Under these conditions I want to conduct math. and sciences to our kids and adolescents. I want to help them prepare the conditions of the expected future.

And I want the robots anf the top management of Google understand  that I am not after money. Money has been proposed to me many times in the past and I rejected.

Of course I do not mean that I am against being paid for work, good work. But I am in a position to work without being paid against. If money comes then I can use it for the benefit of other people who want to conduct good work.

yours very truly,
ismail

FURTHER EVIDENCE

Of course there happened to be a good amount of sideways I thought to be mainways and entered. I want here to keep the line.
I saw in one of his books that Peter Lemusurier mentions the possibility of Orion being the Heavens of Holy Books.
I have visited a good amount of websites publishing related materials. They were supporting.
I spoke with Christians saying that Orion is explicitely mentioned in the Bible.
I saw interpretations like "Biblically, the constellation is likely to represent "... Nimrod, the mighty hunter before the Lord" (Gen 10:9), connected in extra-biblical lore with the building of the Tower of Babel (http://www.tamrin.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=stars&action=display&thread=1782)
I learned from Wikipedia that the Nimrod wore hunter clothes, a good probable way of claiming he is "The Great Hunter", the God.
And then, just about two years ago I saw 'Ali `Imran / 133 : And hasten to forgiveness from your Lord and a garden as wide as the heavens and earth, prepared for the righteous.
This verse says the width (depth) of the Heavens should be equal to its distance to Earth which is roughly true for Orion.


This was a further coincidence.


next post:what all this may imply
ismail

OSIRIS in ORION

So have I happened to begin to think that the heavens may be localized but the shell was too distributed. I began to think about the matter and discussed it with friends. One of the days as I watch TV I noticed that the speaker said the Egyptians believed Osiris lived in Orion. I saw a possibility there and look for it's distance to Earth. There was contoversy but it  could well be 1000 l.y.

I called one of the friends with whom I discussed the subject,  I said the place (probably) mentioned mightwell be Orion. He answered "Orion? Isn't it the place where the humans are claimed to be created?"

But the Heavens were also where human (souls) are created. It was about 2000-2001, I knew Alta-Vista and Yahoo and newly learned Google. Google search was successful.

I wrote A Trial to Synthesis of Science and Religion , sent it to Journal of Philosphy (in England) and got no answer back. I sent it to Canadian Journal of Philosophy mentioning the prior sending and demanding review. The secreatary answered the first mail and informed review was usual. In about two weeks I got another mail from the Journal and surprised because I knew any review would take much longer. The secretary of the Journal was writing with a very polite style begining with "Dear Prof. German;" they could not publish the paper, they would not be allowed to.

I said so be it. I e-mailed the preprint to a couple of people including Dr. Eric Weissstein, knowing he was in the team explored Orion. Only Dr. Gary  Dryfoos of MIT turned back. From all other I got no reply.

The  subject was classified ? Probably!

next  post: further evidence

TRANSACTION, AVERAGES, MEAN

As we have said the distances given in differing sources are not in agreement. As is given in Wikipedia, the distance to Betelgeuse has varied from 300 l.y. to 1300 l.y. and settled around 650 l.y. From this example we may deduce something : If very great differences among data, get the average.
If we have repeating (periodical) data it gives us the chance to Box Car Averaging.
Extreme hypotheses and and theses floated around the average of all said by the -logy (science). Extreme ones were proposed due to two reasons:
1- The way the three pyramids of Egypt are constructed.
2- Rumor and hearsay left behind from the traditional Babylonian-Sumerian-Accadian cultural line.
And the average constructed was based on mainly these extremes. Better said science has reconstructed itself considering these extremes and evaluating them.
Any possible contribution from other sources was failing.
About 13 years ago I, a physicist and E:E, have been forced to leave my post and had free time. I began to drive a little bit mystical and began to reread the Quran this time trying to understand what is being said. I noticed As-Sajdah/5 :
 " He arranges [each] matter from the heaven to the earth; then it will ascend to Him in a Day, the extent of which is a thousand years of those which you count."
Knowing that the particle velocites are bounded by the speed of light I thought of a sphere (spherical shell) around the World with a radius of 1000 light years.


will continue,
ismail

DISTANCES BETTER VISUALIZED

Before we continue to express our implicit hypothesis we want to give another figure:

FURTHER DATA

We have to continue to acquisite data but it is an huge mass. At this stage we have to chose directions in data space, we have to make hypothesis and collect further data.
 We have an hypothesis, an implicit one for the time being.
Among the objects we see around us one of the interesting ones is the Orion Belt. The 3 stars about which we have a great deal of rumor. Let us look at their data:

1- Al Nilam  (Epsilon Orionis) Distance = (approx.) 1300 l.y.( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epsilon_Orionis )
2- Mintaka (Delta Orionis) Distance = (approx.) 900 l.y. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Orionis )
3- Al Nitak (Zeta Orionis) Distance = (approx.) 700 l.y. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeta_Orionis )

Further information may be found in Wikipedia or via Googling. We have to be careful about the inaccuracies of the distances we gave.
Three things are worth mentioning:
a- They are not on the same line as the figure would suggest. It is seen from their distances .
b- For speculations about them just enter "(plane of) belt stars of orion" .
c- The state of Egyptology against these speculations is briefly given in the following work: http://www.legon.demon.co.uk/de_33.htm

(will continue) with love,
ismail

A COMPARATIVE LOOK TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

We continue to collect and reflect data, processing we will do later: